VIH y derechos humanos: acción política para alcanzar ZERO estigma / HIV and human rights: political action to achieve ZERO stigma

Los objetivos de desarrollo sostenible 10.2 y 10.3 ponen de manifiesto la importancia de fomentar la eliminación de leyes discrimi-natorias, así como de implantar políticas y prácticas orientadas a la inclusión social, económica y política de los grupos sociales vulnerables. En este sentido, abordar la discriminación y el estigma asociados al VIH sigue siendo una asignatura pendiente dentro de los países que conforman la Unión Europea. De ahí que esta cuestión haya sido una prioridad política de la Presidencia española del Consejo de la Unión Europea, reflejada en la Reunión de Alto Nivel VIH y derechos humanos. Acción política para alcanzar CERO estigma. En esta reunión se abordaron diferentes estrategias y acuerdos para promover la eliminación del estigma y la discriminación asociada al VIH en diferentes ámbitos y dimen-siones sociales, políticas e institucionales.(AU)

According to Sustainable Development Goals 10.2 and 10.3, it is imperative to promote the elimination of discriminatory laws, as well as implement policies and practices for the inclusion of vulnerable social groups on the social, economic and political fronts. In this regard, HIV-related discrimination and stigma remain unaddressed in many European Union countries. Fighting HIV-related stigma has been one of the main priorities of the Spanish Presidency of the Council of the European Union. This commitment was reflected in the High Level Meeting entitled HIV and Human Rights. Political action to achieve ZERO stigma. This meeting provided an opportunity to discuss a variety of strategies and agreements for eradicating stigma and discrimination associated with HIV in a variety of social, political, and institutional contexts.(AU)

[HIV and human rights: political action to achieve ZERO stigma]. / VIH y derechos humanos: acción política para alcanzar CERO estigma.

According to Sustainable Development Goals 10.2 and 10.3, it is imperative to promote the elimination of discriminatory laws, as well as implement policies and practices for the inclusion of vulnerable social groups on the social, economic and political fronts. In this regard, HIV-related discrimination and stigma remain unaddressed in many European Union countries. Fighting HIV-related stigma has been one of the main priorities of the Spanish Presidency of the Council of the European Union. This commitment was reflected in the High Level Meeting entitled HIV and Human Rights. Political action to achieve ZERO stigma. This meeting provided an opportunity to discuss a variety of strategies and agreements for eradicating stigma and discrimination associated with HIV in a variety of social, political, and institutional contexts.

Los objetivos de desarrollo sostenible 10.2 y 10.3 ponen de manifiesto la importancia de fomentar la eliminación de leyes discriminatorias, así como de implantar políticas y prácticas orientadas a la inclusión social, económica y política de los grupos sociales vulnerables. En este sentido, abordar la discriminación y el estigma asociados al VIH sigue siendo una asignatura pendiente dentro de los países que conforman la Unión Europea. De ahí que esta cuestión haya sido una prioridad política de la Presidencia española del Consejo de la Unión Europea, reflejada en la Reunión de Alto Nivel VIH y derechos humanos. Acción política para alcanzar CERO estigma. En esta reunión se abordaron diferentes estrategias y acuerdos para promover la eliminación del estigma y la discriminación asociada al VIH en diferentes ámbitos y dimensiones sociales, políticas e institucionales.

Effectiveness of a home-environmental intervention package and an early child development intervention on child health and development in high-altitude rural communities in the Peruvian Andes: a cluster-randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Unsafe drinking water, poor sanitation and hygiene, exposure to household air pollution and low cognitive and socio-emotional stimulation are risk factors affecting children in low- and middle-income countries. We implemented an integrated home-environmental intervention package (IHIP), comprising a kitchen sink, hygiene education and a certified improved biomass cookstove, and an early child development (ECD) programme to improve children´s health and developmental outcomes in the rural high-altitude Andes of Peru. METHODS: We conducted a one-year cluster-randomised controlled trial among 317 children < 36 months divided into 4 arms (IHIP + ECD, IHIP, ECD, and Control) and 40 clusters (10 clusters per arm). ECD status (socio-emotional, fine and gross motor, communication, cognitive skills, and an overall performance) measured with the Peruvian Infant Development Scale and the occurrence of self-reported child diarrhoea from caretakers were primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes included the occurrence of acute respiratory infections and the presence of thermo-tolerant faecal bacteria in drinking water. The trial was powered to compare each intervention against its control arm but it did not allow pairwise comparisons among the four arms. Primary analysis followed the intention-to-treat principle. For the statistical analysis, we employed generalised estimating equation models with robust standard errors and an independent correlation structure. RESULTS: We obtained ECD information from 101 children who received the ECD intervention (individually and combined with IHIP) and 102 controls. Children who received the ECD intervention performed better in all the domains compared to controls. We found differences in the overall performance (64 vs. 39%, odd ratio (OR): 2.8; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.6-4.9) and the cognitive domain (62 vs 46%, OR: 1.9; 95% CI: 1.1-3.5). Data analysis of child morbidity included 154 children who received the IHIP intervention (individually and combined with ECD) and 156 controls. We recorded 110,666 child-days of information on diarrhoea morbidity and observed 1.3 mean episodes per child-year in the children who received the IHIP intervention and 1.1 episodes in the controls. This corresponded to an incidence risk ratio of 1.2 (95% CI: 0.8-1.7). CONCLUSIONS: Child stimulation improved developmental status in children, but there was no health benefit associated with the home-environmental intervention. Limited year-round access to running water at home and the possible contamination of drinking water after boiling were two potential factors linked to the lack of effect of the home-environmental intervention. Potential interactions between ECD and home-environmental interventions need to be further investigated. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN, ISRCTN-26548981. Registered 15 January 2018-Retrospectively registered, https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN26548981 .

A factorial cluster-randomised controlled trial combining home-environmental and early child development interventions to improve child health and development: rationale, trial design and baseline findings.

BACKGROUND: Exposure to unhealthy environments and inadequate child stimulation are main risk factors that affect children's health and wellbeing in low- and middle-income countries. Interventions that simultaneously address several risk factors at the household level have great potential to reduce these negative effects. We present the design and baseline findings of a cluster-randomised controlled trial to evaluate the impact of an integrated home-environmental intervention package and an early child development programme to improve diarrhoea, acute respiratory infections and childhood developmental outcomes in children under 36 months of age living in resource-limited rural Andean Peru. METHODS: We collected baseline data on children's developmental performance, health status and demography as well as microbial contamination in drinking water. In a sub-sample of households, we measured indoor kitchen 24-h air concentration levels of carbon monoxide (CO) and fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and CO for personal exposure. RESULTS: We recruited and randomised 317 children from 40 community-clusters to four study arms. At baseline, all arms had similar health and demographic characteristics, and the developmental status of children was comparable between arms. The analysis revealed that more than 25% of mothers completed primary education, a large proportion of children were stunted and diarrhoea prevalence was above 18%. Fifty-two percent of drinking water samples tested positive for thermo-tolerant coliforms and the occurrence of E.coli was evenly distributed between arms. The mean levels of kitchen PM2.5 and CO concentrations were 213 µg/m3 and 4.8 ppm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The trial arms are balanced with respect to most baseline characteristics, such as household air and water pollution, and child development. These results ensure the possible estimation of the trial effectiveness. This trial will yield valuable information for assessing synergic, rational and cost-effective benefits of the combination of home-based interventions. TRIAL REGISTRY: ISRCTN-26548981.